|
Lauralee Harris, executive
director of the MHA of Tarrant County in Texas, talked to The Bell
recently about her MHA’s pioneering new School-based Mental Health
Education Project pilot program, their lessons learned and plans to
take the program national.
NMHA: First, would you please give
us a brief overview of
your pilot project and its goals?
Laurlee Harris: We are developing a
mental health education curriculum, based on a public health model,
that is fully
integrated into general school curriculum. We have just
launched the pilot project in six schools in the county but
designed the program for distribution to elementary, middle and
high schools nationwide. It is designed to supplement material
traditionally taught, rather than having to be taught as a
separate class. Although some very good material has been
available on specific issues such as bullying, stress and selfesteem,
it was difficult for teachers to implement because they
had to take extra class time to present the materials and to
incorporate them into the topic at hand. By designing this
curriculum, we hope that mental health education will be
provided on a consistent basis, through a number of subjects.
| Lauralee Harris is the executive director of
the MHA of Tarrant County (Texas). To find out how your MHA can
get involved in the pilot program for the School-based Mental Health
Project, contact Lauralee at lauralee@mhatc.org or 817-335-5405. |
NMHA: What sparked the idea for this project?
LH: This project was conceived because we were not able to
measure any long-term outcomes from the individual class
session approach we had been taking to educating students— basically,
we would receive a call from a teacher or school to design and instruct
a single class session on a specific mental
health issue We also realized that if we were to educate large
numbers of students, it would be impossible to do so with our
own staff and volunteers. We believed that it was important to
provide a comprehensive mental health education curriculum
that could be easily taught by regular classroom teachers, and
that could fit into regular subject content.
NMHA: How is the program being piloted and when?
LH: We are conducting student and teacher focus groups and
expect to pilot the 8th grade modules in six schools this school
year, and to develop 7th and 9th grade modules for piloting in
the 2005-6 school year.
NMHA: How is the curriculum structured and how is it
applied
in the classroom?
LH:The curriculum is integrated into several different subjects,
so that all students will receive information over several years.
It
is designed to fit into the course content, is matched to
achievement tests in terms of required skills, and is grade-level
specific. Although it could be used as stand-alone material, it
is
our intent that it be much more fully integrated into regular
learning opportunities.
NMHA: What topics does the curriculum cover?
LH: The 8th grade modules are designed to be integrated into
literature/language arts and social studies/history. They also
include recommendations for coordinating with science, health,
math, drama, music and art activities. The 8th grade modules
include topics such as understanding mental health, stigma,
depression and suicide, and eating disorders. Other grade levels
will include bullying, self-esteem, anxiety disorders, major
mental illnesses, stress and other topics. Each module contains
an introduction to the concept, an overview of the mental health
issue addressed, a power point presentation, lesson plans and
scripts, pre- and post-tests, hand-outs and other recommended
resources, and activities. Each module has components that can
be taught over several class sessions.
NMHA: Would you give an example of how the curriculum
is
integrated? For example, how would a teacher integrate a
mental health lesson into a literature class?
LH:The teacher and class would discuss, for instance, how
depression is affecting a certain character in a book the students
are reading. Or the teacher may cover how depression may have
affected the author, if that’s the case. The teacher would also
ask
students to write in their journals about emotions. A group
discussion could lead to such topics as what it means to have
depression or to feel stigmatized — or whatever the subject
matter dictates.
NMHA: Do teachers
who present the
curriculum need
special training?
LH:Teachers need no
special training, only
motivation to actually
use the materials. An
implementation guide
is provided to assist
administrators,
program coordinators
and teachers in successfully integrating the modules into
their
classes.
NMHA: How is the project funded?
How long did it take to secure funding?
LH:The project was funded for one year through a federal
appropriations earmark by the office of Congresswoman Kay
Granger. Although this is a direct grant, it must be administered
by an agency to oversee quality control standards and other
issues, and ours was assigned to HRSA. Our project manager
has
been an enthusiastic supporter of this effort, and has
provided
input, review and guidance. We helped to ensure a seamless
process with HRSA by writing the project as if it were
for a
competitive bid, with accountability, technical assistance,
outcome measures and evaluation built in. In fact, we’d
developed the basic project concept and submitted it for
funding to two other agencies several years before Rep.
Granger offered us funding. We had confidence that the
concept was important and fundable, and constantly looked
for resources to develop the project. More recently, we
won a
grant from a local foundation that will ensure a second
year of
the project.
NMHA: How did the MHA devise the curriculum? Who took
part in the process?
LH:The curriculum development began in August
2003 by a
team of educators hired through the grant. These include
a
masters-level special education teacher, a retired school
principal who is also a counselor, and a classroom teacher
with mental health experience. The grant also provided
funds
for technical assistance — our national consultant
team was drawn from technical assistance centers already
under
SAMHSA contracts, and a couple of others who just had
an
interest in the project. These include NMHA, UCLA, the
University of Maryland, and nationally recognized curriculum
and mental health experts. We have worked closely with
subject area curriculum specialists in the Ft. Worth
Independent School District.
NMHA: What challenges did you face in the project
development phase?
LH:As we have developed this project it has become apparent
to us that there is both a wealth of information and
assistance
available for school mental health education efforts,
and a
serious lack of easy access to information and resources
or
coordination of efforts. For example, the UCLA and
University of Maryland School Mental Health Resource
Centers are valuable resources for background material— which we ultimately used to help develop the curriculum— but
we were not directed to them initially. Our grant was
placed in HRSA for management, but, in the meantime,
SAMHSA has also issued grants to two national companies
for
development of mental health education materials,
neither of
which appeared to be coordinated with other similar
efforts.
But, in the end, our team of consultants ensured that
our
vision dramatically expanded from a community-based
program to one that potentially has tremendous value
on a
national level.
NMHA: Have you faced any challenges to implementation?
LH: Our major barrier was understanding the educational
system bureaucracy. Structuring the curriculum so that it is
flexible and can be easily implemented by school
administrators and teachers nationwide was also a challenge.
We managed to escape a potentially major hurdle quite by
accident: Because we had designed our curriculum to
supplement existing subject curriculum, it does not require
extensive state or local approval for use. Had we devised an
independent curriculum, we would have faced an extensive
and complex review process.
NMHA: What types of reactions have you received from
within the school system?
LH:We have received nothing but enthusiasm. Everyone who
has reviewed the 8th grade curriculum manual has been highly
complimentary regarding both content and ease of
implementation. The general reaction has been “Wow! Why
hasn’t this been done before?"
NMHA: Have you received any
reactions from students?
LH:We are just now beginning student piloting, but our experience
with our Youth Suicide Prevention Project (YSP),
which we implemented in spring 2004 in 17 schools, leads us
to believe that students will both enjoy this new material and
benefit from it. Our experience with YSP showed that
students want this information, talk about it with each other,
and request counseling assistance as a result of their
education. Also, if schools desire to inform parents/guardians
about the use of the curriculum, a form has been included for
that purpose, and they are encouraged to include parents in
the learning environment.
NMHA: How will you evaluate the project and measure
outcomes?
LH: Our grant included an evaluation component. The
University of North Texas Health Science Center School of
Public Health is conducting a process evaluation, and has
developed outcome evaluation instruments for us. Outcomes
from this approach, as with most public health approaches,
are expected to take several years to be measurable. We
expect to see evidence of reduced absenteeism, fewer
disciplinary referrals and referrals to alternative education,
increased utilization of school counseling and referral
resources, and improvements in academic achievement.
NMHA: What are your plans for expanding the pilot and
taking the program into full swing?
LH: We hope to acquire funding to produce modules for
grades 6-12, offer the entire curriculum to school districts
nationwide and to be able to provide regular updates. Our
vision includes a subscription Web site that will include
multimedia downloads and constantly changing new
materials. At a minimum, we will offer each grade level a
curriculum manual in hard copy when it is finalized. We
expect to make the 8th grade manual available by the end of
2004. However, if any MHA chapters would be interested in
assisting with piloting, we would be delighted to talk with
them. We are only one small MHA, but what we are doing has
the potential for major national impact, in spite of a national
education system that is only beginning to address the healthy
mental and emotional development of its students.
|