What have States Done to Ensure Insurance Parity?
printer friendly version (51K pdf) |
Best Parity Laws Parity applies to all mental health and substance abuse disorders under private insurance plans. No exemptions.
- Connecticut 1999
- Maryland 1994
- Minnesota 1995
- Vermont 1997
- Oregon 2005
Good Parity Laws
Not quite comprehensive parity due to certain exemptions and/or limitations.
- Indiana 1999/2001/2003
Includes substance abuse; 50 employees exemption; 4% cost increase cap
- Kentucky
2000
50 employees exemption; includes substance abuse
- Maine 1995/ 2003
20 employees exemption; includes substance abuse; excludes diagnoses
that are designated as “V” codes.
- New Mexico 2000
No substance abuse; 1.5% cost increase cap for less than 50 employees & 2.5%
for 50 or more employees
- North Carolina 1991/1997/2007
Full parity for SMI; Financial parity for all other conditions; no substance
abuse.
- Rhode Island 1994/2001
Some limitations on outpatient visits; includes substance abuse
- Washington
2005/2007
No substance abuse
| Limited Parity Laws Parity applies only to select groups such as those with severe mental illness (SMI) or state & local employees, or only protects against certain types of discrimination.
- Arizona 1997/2001
Mirrors federal law; 50 employees exemption; 1% cost increase cap; parity for
state employees
- Arkansas 1997/2001
50 employees exemption; 1.5% cost increase cap; excludes state employees;
full parity in SCHIP
- California 1999 (SMI)
Includes children
- Colorado 1997/2007
Includes substance abuse
- Delaware 1998/2001 (SMI)
Includes substance abuse
- Hawaii 1999/2004 (SMI)
25 employee exemption
- Illinois 2001 (SMI)
50 employee exemption
- Iowa 2005 (SMI)
50 employee exemption
- Louisiana 1999 (SMI)
Includes children; 50 employee exemption; 1% cost increase cap
- Massachusetts
2000 (SMI)
50 employees exemption; includes children & co-occurring disorders
- Missouri
2004
Limits out-of-pocket expenses; limited substance abuse treatment
- Montana
1999 (SMI)
- Nebraska 1999 (SMI)
15 employee exemption
- Nevada 1999 (SMI)
Limits out-of-pocket expenses; 25 employees exemption
- New Hampshire 1994/2002 (SMI)
- New Jersey 1999/2002 (SMI)
- New York 2006 (SMI)
Includes children; 50 employee exemption
- Ohio 2006 (SMI)
1% cost increase cap
- Oklahoma 1999 (SMI)
50 employee exemption; 2% cost increase cap
- South Carolina 2000/2005 (SMI)
50 employees exemption
- South Dakota 1998 (SMI)
- Tennessee 1998
25 employees exemption; 1% cost increase cap; excludes copayments, coinsurance
and deductibles
- Texas 1991/1997 (SMI)
1991: Limited parity for state & local government employees
1997: parity expanded to rest of state; 50 employees exemption
- Utah 2000
Limits out-of-pocket expenses; 50 employees exemption
- Virginia 2004 (SMI)
Includes substance abuse; 25 employees exemption
- West Virginia 2004 (SMI)
2004 repealed alcohol coverage; 1 or 2% cost-increase cap
| Mental Health Mandates, Not Parity - Alabama
- Alaska
- D.C.
- Florida
- Georgia
- Kansas
- Michigan
- Mississippi
- North
Dakota
- Pennsylvania
- Wisconsin
No Parity or Mandate Laws |
For More Information
Mental Health America continues to expand resources to assist advocates across the country. Please direct inquiries to Mental Health America's Advocacy Resource Center or by phone (1-800-969-6642, option 6).